Skip to main content
article icon

Rogue 'school' exploits law to hit kids

News | Published in TES Newspaper on 2 October, 2009 | By: William Stewart

Eleven boxes of government papers fail to stop Tyndale from striking pupils

The head of a Christian “school” that uses corporal punishment says he can, and will, continue to smack children legally despite a new law passed to stop him.

Tyndale Academy in Forest Gate, east London, was deliberately set up a decade ago to fall outside the legal definition of a school so that it would not be affected by the 1998 ban on school staff hitting pupils.

Ministers have been trying to bring Tyndale Academy into line since 2003 in a case that has already generated 11 boxes of official government papers.

A new category of “independent educational institution” was created by the Education and Skills Act last year to cover Tyndale and make it follow the same rules as schools.

But the regulations needed to bring the new category into effect will not come into force until September 2010 at the earliest. Ferris Lindsay, Tyndale’s head, says that even when they do, he will be able to operate outside them.

He began advertising for new pupils this week, and says if they are of primary age then he will smack them when necessary.

“Corporal punishment should be a small but important part of the training of ordinary children with run-of-the-mill naughtiness,” he told The TES.

Mr Lindsay, a qualified teacher, said small group sizes would allow him to offer primary pupils a good education in less than the 12-and-a-half hours of weekly tuition that triggers the independent educational institution definition.

“I don’t sit there supervising children doing writing because that is a waste of time,” he said. “I teach them all the time.”

Corporal punishment at Tyndale, where rules are based on the Bible, was only ever given with explicit parental permission and was a small part of a disciplinary policy that also included stars for good behaviour, he said.

But pupils could be smacked on the palm by a teacher’s hand for direct disobedience or acts they knew were wrong, such as persistent swearing.

Ofsted told the then Department for Education and Skills about smacking at Tyndale as long ago as 2004. But Mr Lindsay said that no official had raised the matter with him since.

They have, however, made copious efforts to regulate the academy. Prior to the new legislation, the Government went through two official consultations and sent 399 letters and emails in 2006/07 alone, but made little progress.

Mr Lindsay said: “It is remarkable that that they go to these lengths to ensure conformity, and even then, the way they have drafted the legislation means the law as passed will still allow oddballs to operate.”

He has not used corporal punishment for 14 months, but this is because he has only had secondary-age pupils, whom he no longer smacks. “That is not because it is wrong,” he said. “But an older child can do more damage - not physically, but legally.”

A Department for Children, Schools and Families spokesman said: “Local authorities have a duty to ensure that children in their area are receiving a suitable education.

“It will be for them to judge whether parents are providing that by sending their children to an organisation offering only two full school days a week.”

Punishment pains

  • 1987: Corporal punishment banned in state schools
  • 1998: Ban extended to all schools
  • 1999: Tyndale set up outside legal definition of a “school”
  • 2004: Ofsted informs Government of Tyndale’s smacking policy
  • 2004: Principal told to register as a school or face prosecution
  • 2005: Government admits Tyndale not officially a school
  • 2008: Education and Skills Act creates new category for Tyndale
  • 2009: Principal says he will cut hours to stay outside category.

Subscribe to the magazine

2 average rating

Comment (4)

  • The headline is a little unfair to say "exploits the law", when that part of it was designed to capture us in the first place. All we wanted to do was to continue to teach as we have done for many years. We wanted parental liberty to be upheld in this matter (not teachers

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

    Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2 October, 2009


  • It's a shame the previous comment was cut short. It is also a shame that the TES appeas to have used language and phraseology that exposes their own opinion of corporal punishment so clearly. I certainly do not feel represented by the TES on this matter. I wonder how many others, if honestly, earnestly (and, possibly, anonymously) balloted, would condemn all corporal punishment outright.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

    5 October, 2009


  • Personally I have never felt the need to hit any of the children in my classes, and I have worked in a few tough schools! It is very hard work to keep them in line but I am creative in how I go about it. I am not against hitting specifically but I would not like to work in an atmosphere where that was done.I do agree though that the article is very clearly biased on the views of the writer though.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

    7 October, 2009

    Annie Smith

  • I attended an Accelerated Christian School in the 90s, which used paddling for corporal punishment. When the law changed in 1998 to ban them from doing it, they simply brought in the children's parents to administer the punishments.

    I thought it was arrogant of the school to be so convinced of their own rightness that they would find loopholes in the law. They regarded their interpretation of Scriptures as more important than any discoveries in educational psychology.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

    8 October, 2009


Add your comment

Subscribe to TES magazine
Join TES for free now

Join TES for free now

Four great reasons to join today...

1. Be part of the largest network of teachers in the world – over 2m members
2. Download over 600,000 free teaching resources
3. Get a personalized email of the most relevant resources for you delivered to your inbox.
4. Find out first about the latest jobs in education