Skip to main content
article icon

Off duty but not off limits

Features | Published in TES Newspaper on 13 February, 2009 | By: Nick Morrison

You’re good at your job, but your after-hours activities have raised a few eyebrows. Does it really matter what you do outside school, you’re the perfect role model when you are in the classroom. But does it really matter what you do when you leave the school gates?

Ralph Morse knows what it’s like to be at the centre of a furore about his private life. The musician and actor - he counts appearances as a storm trooper in two Star Wars films among his credits - was suspended from his job as a drama teacher at an Essex secondary school after a newspaper article highlighted his role as the first national youth manager for the Pagan Federation.

The headteacher was quoted at the time as saying he was “appalled” the school was associated with paganism, adding: “There is no doubt this man’s private interests are impinging on the school.” Mr Morse was subsequently reinstated, although he has since left teaching.

Mr Morse knows that teachers are expected to be role models, but says the expectation of a certain standard of behaviour should apply only to what they do in school. “A teacher’s suitability for the classroom should be judged on how they conduct themselves within their professional role,” he says.

“Legitimate activities that do not interfere with their teaching role are not the business of the school. Unless a teacher’s private life is shown to directly affect their ability to teach, it should be of no interest to anyone else.”

But not everyone has the same view of where the boundary between private life and public duty should be. For every teacher who thinks it’s “anything goes as long as it’s legal”, or that breaking the law is none of the school’s business provided there are no children involved, there is one who believes that teachers should follow higher standards of behaviour and must accept this will curtail their private life.

It is a debate that surfaces at school level every time a teacher’s out- of-school activities come to the attention of school leaders. At the end of this month, it will come into focus at a national level when a consultation on the General Teaching Council for England’s revised code of conduct comes to a close. The GTC, which aspires to “raise the standing of the profession”, published its draft version at the end of last year, and a breach of the code could see a teacher lose their licence to teach.

The provision in the code that has attracted most controversy is a stipulation that teachers should: “uphold the law and maintain standards of behaviour both inside and outside school that are appropriate given their membership of an important and responsible profession”.

Critics claim that it effectively requires teachers to be on duty 24 hours a day. A petition on the Number 10 website, urging the Prime Minister to remove the reference to outside school from the code, had garnered more than 500 signatures at the time of going to press.

In its official response to the code, the NUT sets its face firmly against bringing out-of-school activities under the GTC’s remit and thus within the range of disciplinary action. Such a move is beyond the council’s powers, according to the union, and “a wholly unacceptable interference in every registered teacher’s private life”.

John Bangs, the union’s head of education, says while the code is acceptable as an aspirational document, it is unreasonable to turn these aspirations into the basis for possibly ending someone’s career. He says it raises the prospect that teachers will be punished twice if they break the law - once by the courts and once by the teaching council.

“This has raised real fears among teachers,” he says. “Serious criminal misconduct has obviously got to be the business of the GTC, but there is a whole set of other areas that should have absolutely nothing to do with them or with employers.”

He says the council’s interference is only reasonable when outside activity affects a teacher’s relationship with school and pupils. But it is far from clear-cut when this is the case. A conviction for possessing child pornography is one thing, but falling out of a pub in front of the parents of your Year 8s is less black and white. This could have an impact on your relationship with the class, but not everyone would say it was enough to warrant disciplinary action.

How the various regulatory bodies view this link between outside behaviour and standing in the school lies at the heart of this controversy. For the GTC, anything that undermines the ability of a teacher to be a role model, wherever it occurs, affects their relationship with pupils, and is therefore a legitimate area of concern. Keith Bartley, chief executive of the council, recognises this can put a greater burden on teachers than on people in other professions.

“If somebody is responsible for the protection, wellbeing and education of children, it could be there is a different standard of expectation on them than on the ordinary citizen,” he says.

The GTC’s disciplinary committee heard 150 cases in 2007-08, involving 222 instances of alleged misconduct. Of this 222, behaviour outside the workplace was an issue in 55. These fall into two categories: where the teacher has been convicted of a criminal offence, and where no law has been broken. One teacher told The TES he had been summoned before the council after his second drink-driving conviction. Despite already being punished once by the courts, he was given a reprimand and told to go on a drink-driving awareness course, even though the magistrates had not thought this necessary.

Mr Bartley defends this system of double punishment. He says the issue is whether the conviction would affect a teacher’s ability to practise, taking into account the circumstances and seriousness of the offence. “Just because it has been dealt with by the courts, there is no direct link as to whether that does or doesn’t mean there is an impact on their teaching,” he says.

There is no ranking to determine which offences will result in a disciplinary hearing. Drink-driving, the most common conviction among teachers accused of misconduct, is only likely to merit further punishment if it is a repeat offence. A teacher convicted of assault can expect to be treated differently, depending on whether the victim was a stranger in a bar in Spain or a parent outside the school gates.

The GTC, and its equivalent bodies in Scotland and Wales, also consider mitigating circumstances. Jeremy Cassidy, a secondary teacher in Beverley, East Yorkshire, was given a reprimand in December but allowed to return to the classroom after he was convicted of assaulting a police officer. Immediately informing his school about the assault and his regret went in his favour.

Emma Jones was given a 12-month registration order, where she has to prove to employers every three months that she is drug free, after she was cautioned by police for possessing heroin. The drug had been found in her car parked outside the gates of the school in Gwynedd, northwest Wales. At its hearing in October, the GTC for Wales was told she was no longer using drugs.

And in November, a head who had received a conviction for indecency was given a reprimand by the disciplinary committee thanks to the fact he had turned around a Birmingham secondary school that had been given a notice to improve.

Not all of the cases coming before disciplinary hearings involve breaking the law, which blurs the line further. Andrew Beasley, a primary school teacher in Essex, was reprimanded last month for appearing in films of a sexual nature. In another case, Adam Walker has been charged with unacceptable professional conduct over allegations he posted racist comments using a laptop owned by his Wearside school. Although the charge relates to activity in school, the teacher claims he has been victimised because of his involvement with the BNP, including standing for the party in local elections. The case will come before the GTC this week.

Nor does every instance of a teacher’s private life jeopardising their career come before the GTC. Some see the teacher leave their job without recourse to a disciplinary hearing. Louise Crolla was told not to return to the Oldham school where she was working on supply after she appeared topless in a newspaper two years ago. Samantha Goldstone left her post as English and drama teacher in Accrington, also in Lancashire, “by mutual agreement”, after parents complained about the erotic vampire fiction on her website.

B ut why are teachers held up as the ultimate role models? Opponents of the code of practice point to footballers, who probably have a greater influence on children, but whose behaviour does not always set a good example. There was only muted dissent when Joey Barton was allowed to return to the Newcastle United midfield after serving a six-month sentence for assault. Steven Gerrard has been told his captaincy of Liverpool and place in the England team are not in doubt while he awaits trial over an alleged assault outside a nightclub. In either case, these misdemeanours (suspected or otherwise) are unlikely to spell an end to their careers.

John Anderson, head of professional practice at the GTC for Scotland, recognises that teachers are just one among many influences, but says their involvement when children are at an impressionable stage in their lives is significant. “We’re not saying that teachers should be nuns and monks,” he says. “We’re all human, but if we’re giving off a message let’s make it a reasonably good one.”

He says most cases that come before their disciplinary body have either been through the courts, where the test is whether they are relevant to teaching, or involve a teacher who has been dismissed for misconduct. “There are grey areas, and it is a question of where you draw the line.”

The GTC for Scotland’s code of conduct, published in May last year, says teachers should be aware they are role models, and should “avoid situations both within and without the classroom that could be in breach of the criminal law, or may call into question your suitability to be a teacher”.

John Anderson recognises that this puts an extra burden on teachers. “Of course a teacher is entitled to a private life, however there are instances when maybe that private life begins to overlap with their professional life.”

Teachers share this burden with other professions where integrity is a key part of the practitioner’s ability to build relationships. The General Medical Council, the regulatory body for doctors, says in its core guidance that “you must make sure that your conduct at all times justifies your patients’ trust in you and the public’s trust in the profession”. A GMC spokesman says any action a doctor takes that is contrary to this guidance could be subject to investigation, whether it happens in the workplace or not.

Mal Davies, chair of the GTC for Wales, suggests that the status of the profession is such that teachers’ behaviour is always under scrutiny. “Teachers have a terrific impact on the development of young people,” he says. “We should, at all times, act in a professional and appropriate manner.” The GTC for Wales provides guidance for teachers, but has not drawn up a code of conduct, although a draft code is expected to be published this year.

Mr Bartley, of the GTC for England, says most cases are referred to them either by the police, who have a duty to pass on details of relevant convictions, or by employers, when a teacher has been dismissed for misconduct or has resigned when they might otherwise have been charged with misconduct. But complaints about individual teachers from the public have gone up dramatically, tripling in five years and now making up one in six of all referrals.

Margaret Morrisey, of the lobby group Parents Out Loud, says they are right to worry if their child’s teacher is rolling around drunk outside the pub every Saturday night. “If you put yourself up as a role model to youngsters, then you have a duty to them and their parents to set a good example,” she says. “If you don’t accept that, then probably the best thing is find a different profession.”

But Mick Brookes, general secretary of the NAHT, the headteachers’ union, fears the inclusion of the out-of-school activity proviso in the code could end up damaging the profession. “If you insist that teachers are quasi-saints, then you will put people off coming into the profession, unless they’re quasi-saints,” he says.

Mr Brookes recognises that teachers are role models, and this does put additional expectations on them, but he believes there are dangers in trying to be paragons of virtue.

“I don’t think the role model of being a saint is helpful. It doesn’t reflect the realities of the lives of children and young people,” he says. “We work in the real world and the real world is where people have a right to go out and enjoy themselves.”

Mr Brookes says that a second punishment for a criminal offence other than one imposed by the courts is over the top. Paul Davies was allowed to return to work last year when the High Court quashed a prohibition order imposed by the GTC for Wales. The headteacher of a south Wales primary had been jailed for 15 months for dangerous driving after a crash that left the other driver in a wheelchair. “He was an excellent head and why should he be punished twice? If they’re doing a good job, they should be allowed to return to their livelihood,” Mr Brookes suggests. “Provided it doesn’t affect your ability to do your job and the smooth running of the school, it is part of your private life and it isn’t the business of the school management or anybody else.”

This at least seems to be common ground: it’s only a problem when it’s relevant to teaching. Few people realistically advocate a complete separation of private life and school. Even the most laissez faire recognise that offences involving children should be potentially career- threatening. But there is no consensus over where to draw the line. We all have our own standards. For every one who thinks appearing in adult films is an inalienable right, there is another who believes it undermines a teacher’s authority. So where do you stand?

Subscribe to the magazine

4 average rating

Comment (9)

  • Well written article, Nick. At last someone seems to be taking this issue seriously. Did you also know that the NUT have tabled an EDM in the House of Commons on this issue?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

    Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    14 February, 2009


  • When i served on the NASUWT nec, we argued and came to the conclusion that any teacher who undertakes activities outside contractual hours must be made fully aware of the consequences if things go wrong. We advised members not to volunteer for such activities. Any teachers who do, may be putting their job on the line if problems occur. Teachers in charge will always be put in the firing line by ambulance chasing lawyers. I am constantly surprised by teachers who are completely naive about the possible consequences of their actions. On their past decisions in these matters, the GTC will not be sympathetic, and sadly they have the power to destroy your career and you don't have the right to a lawyer/ barrister to put your case.
    The teachers unions' silence on this matter has been deafening. Never mind an EDM they should be ballotting members on a boycott of the GTC, instead of paying their executive members to sit on the GTC panels and pontificate.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

    16 February, 2009


  • I am trying to work out what is wrong with being a Pagan?

    What If I admit to being a Muslim, is that banned as well? Or I admit to worship of a rock god or tree spirit!

    What a joke. No wonder they had to reinstate him. This country is starting to really become a joke.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

    17 February, 2009


  • All this is tosh.

    The GTC is a body who has no point beyond counting teachers, which could be perfectly well done by the DFSC. Everything else has no real value and is done incompetently.

    As a pointless quango, it is going to be first in line for the chop when the government's money runs out (about nowish).

    So what it is doing is trying to extend its reach and power and bed itself in, by claiming it is performing some sort of useful function.

    Unless wasting public funds can be described as such the GTC should be closed immediately and all its employees sacked.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

    17 February, 2009


  • One of the most appalling features of this bunch of inept quasi-fascists is that someone dragged up before their nasty little kangaroo court has to fund their own defence, even if they *win*.

    Thus the GTC denies to teachers what our centuries old justice system provides to rapists and murderers.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

    17 February, 2009


  • I don't think the GTC will go because of lack of funding - they will just take more from our salaries without our agreement or consent. I urge you all to fill in the so called "consultation" on the GTC website. Here you are invited to comment on the code of conduct which they are about to impose as if teachers can't behave professionally unless they tell us! In addition to the usual anodyne questions where you can tick "strongly disagree", they give boxes for your own comments so you can clearly question the validity and value of their existence. Then if they are genuinely consulting, we should expect them all to resign in favour of a proper independent professional body which represents us rather than seeks to pillory us at our own expense.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

    17 February, 2009


  • If they break the law that is one thing but things such as being a pagan I think are NOT the school's business! I wanted to help set up a group for "childfree" people - those who are happy to not have their own kids. The biggest reason I did not was that I was afraid my school would somehow find out about it and see it as a conflict of being a teacher. I think there is a line some things are not appropriate others are noone's business we should be entitled to have a life too just like anybody else!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

    19 February, 2009


  • I wholeheartedly agree with Autismuc's comments.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

    19 February, 2009


  • I echo the comments of Mick Brooks, that the only people who are going to suffer from this débâcle are, yet again, the kids. There is already a massive shortage of teachers, particularly at the upper end of the experience and responsibility ladder, and to further undermine the status of the profession in this way is only going to put people further off entering, or staying part of, the profession.

    The comparison with footballers is a good one, but the same thing to could so easily be said of pop stars or reality TV stars; and what about the biggest (indirect) role models that young people have - their parents?

    Further vilification of an already beleaguered profession will serve nobody, least of all an embattled government, any good at all.

    I'm not sure that tonycallaghan read the article to be honest, but his final comment, like those of autismuk are very valid - the GTC is a pointless waste of money - both ours, as teachers and taxpayers - that serves no purpose with regard to school improvement.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

    12 April, 2009


Add your comment

Subscribe to TES magazine
Join TES for free now

Join TES for free now

Four great reasons to join today...

1. Be part of the largest network of teachers in the world – over 2m members
2. Download over 600,000 free teaching resources
3. Get a personalized email of the most relevant resources for you delivered to your inbox.
4. Find out first about the latest jobs in education