Skip to main content
article icon

Inclusion is still a novelty for teacher trainers

Comment | Published in TES Newspaper on 9 September, 2011 | By: Lani Florian

In recent years the policy of inclusive education - the idea that all children can and should be educated together in mainstream schools - has become increasingly common worldwide as a strategy to deal with diversity and difference. But it has proved difficult to implement.

While almost all school-aged children attend mainstream schools, there are big differences in the quality of educational opportunities available. This can create confusion for parents as they try to make good decisions on which school is the best for their child. It also raises important equity issues for policy-makers working to reduce the discrepancies in educational opportunity for students.

Today, too many mainstream schools still struggle to deliver the promise of inclusive education to achieve good academic and social results for everybody. A key concern is that many classroom teachers report feeling unprepared for inclusive education. Why is this and what can be done about it?

Teacher training has an important role to play in how well prepared new teachers feel for the challenges of today’s schools and classrooms.But these are very different from the places where those who prepare tomorrow’s teachers taught.

New thinking about teacher training is needed to meet the challenges of today’s classrooms - their increasing cultural, linguistic and developmental diversity along with the pressure to achieve high academic standards for everybody, including students with special educational needs, disabilities and other difficulties in learning.

In reality, very little is known about what constitutes the professional knowledge base needed to prepare teachers for the challenges of today’s schools, and there is very little consensus how best to achieve it. Hence the current debate about the relative role of different providers of teacher training.

The central problem for those who prepare teachers is figuring out how to reconcile new approaches to teacher training that keep abreast of social change, technological innovations and shifting demographics with the challenges they present to so much existing practice in schools. Can teacher training both prepare teachers to enter the profession and change practice in schools?

An unacknowledged tension is reflected in the structure of initial teacher training, where there may be contradictions between what is taught in a course and what is experienced in school, particularly when the knowledge is contested or emergent - as in the case of “inclusive education”. Is it possible to develop a way of working that respects and challenges the status quo?

A central task for teacher trainers will be to explore the ways in which practising teachers and schools have become more inclusive of children who might have found learning and participation difficult in the past. They need to develop a shared understanding of these teachers’ practice that can then be built into initial teacher training. This approach avoids the problems associated with previous teacher training reform efforts, for example requiring a course in multiculturalism or a special-needs education, which tends to be an add-on rather than changing much of the existing content in initial teacher training.

Additionally, teacher trainers should accept Ofsted’s finding that the knowledge contained in many special-needs courses has proved insufficient to improve inclusive practice in schools. In the short time that student teachers are in initial training it is impossible to anticipate every type of challenge or difficulty they might meet in their professional lives. New strategies for preparing teachers to enter a profession that accepts individual and collective responsibility for improving the learning and participation of all children are needed.

Among these new strategies is the need to move away from a polarising debate about the best environment for initial teacher training - university or school - and to consider new forms of partnership based on a deep respect for the complex work teachers do and acknowledgement that the challenges they face reflect the changing world.

As teachers in mainstream schools struggle to deliver on the promise of inclusive education to achieve good academic and social results for everybody, the time has come for teacher trainers to ask hard questions about their role in reproducing the status quo. Their willingness to do that will go a long way towards helping make schools more inclusive for everyone.

Lani Florian is chair of social and educational inclusion at Aberdeen University. She is speaking at the TES SEN International Conference on 14- 15 October at the Business Design Centre, London. For information, go to

Subscribe to the magazine

as yet unrated

Comment (4)

  • While we still have independent schools which openly select by social standing, grammar schools which hide the fact they select by social standing, pretending they select by ability, faith schools selecting by faith & ethnicity and free schools selecting by ability of their parents to buy a home in a middle class area we can never have 'inclusive education' - the idea that all children can and should be educated together in mainstream schools.

    The priority of Gove is elitisl he doesn't 'get' inclusion as him & his mates have never been inclusive of anyone outside their own social class.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

    9 September, 2011

    Brooke Bond

  • Or we can accept that inclusion was always an ideological policy, not a genuine pedagogic need. At its inception it was aimed at ensuring that children with physical disabilities had provision made for them to access mainstream communities, and hail hail that, I say. It was never meant to be a rod with which to beat teachers, forcing them to teach children with extreme spectrum behaviour or personality disorders. And THAT only happened once people started to believe that such behaviours were automatically indicative of something recognisably medical.

    Which assumes that being badly behaved is a medical condition, rather than an aberration of personality. It's the fallacy of hard determinism, that reduces children, and all people, to helpless engines of their environments and genetic destiny. And it's made teaching Hell for thousands of professionals, and millions of students who don't deserve being sacrificed on the altar of ideology for the sake of a tiny minority who rebel against their own education.

    Teacher trainers who advocate inclusion at all costs, are condemning their students to years of misery and poor practise. I recommend they spend a few years in hard schools before they burden others with their dogma.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

    11 September, 2011


  • Tom,

    What a strange character you are, trying to turn a simple idea of 'fairness' and 'equality' in our schools into a political battle.

    Just a couple of points to start:

    DOGMA is the established belief or doctrine held by a religion, or by extension by some other group or organization. It is authoritative and not to be disputed, doubted, or diverged from, by the practitioners or believers. The main purpose behind an IDEOLOGY is to offer either change in society, or adherence to a set of ideals where conformity already exists, through a normative thought process. Ideologies are systems of abstract thought applied to public matters.

    Quote: 'Teacher trainers who advocate inclusion at all costs, are condemning their students to years of misery and poor practise. I recommend they spend a few years in hard schools before they burden others with their dogma.'

    I'm currently a teacher 'trainer' having worked at the chalkface for 25 years; most people in teacher training have HUGE amounts of experience of teaching. We aren't in the business of dogma or ideology; we do not sit around all day filling student teachers heads with rubbish. Do you HAVE any experience as a teacher of did you make this rubbish up after reading the Daily Mail?

    Inclusion is not a dogma or part of an ideology. Please offer evidence that inclusion 'assumes that being badly behaved is a medical condition'; you just made that up! Also please offer evidence that inclusion policies have ever been 'a rod with which to beat teachers, forcing them to teach children with extreme spectrum behaviour or personality disorders'.

    Inclusion is about not having EXCLUSION. Inclusive education differs from previously held notions of ‘integration’ and ‘mainstreaming’, which tended to be concerned principally with disability and ‘special educational needs’ and implied learners changing or becoming ‘ready for’ or deserving of accommodation by the mainstream. By contrast, inclusion is about the child’s right to participate and the school’s duty to accept the child...........In my books it is about FAIRNESS & EQUALITY for individual children which the likes of you would have labelled and excluded from 'normal education'.

    You must really hate the new anti-discriminatory climate eh? Now we've stopped discriminating on race, gender, age etc you still want children discriminated against on labels of exclusion. You must be a really nice guy.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

    15 September, 2011

    Brooke Bond

  • Tom, we can accept that the inclusion agenda is an ideological policy, and sadly, I don't think the state of total inclusion will ever happen. This, however, does not mean we should stop striving to achieve it.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

    7 October, 2011


Add your comment

Subscribe to TES magazine
Join TES for free now

Join TES for free now

Four great reasons to join today...

1. Be part of the largest network of teachers in the world – over 2m members
2. Download over 600,000 free teaching resources
3. Get a personalized email of the most relevant resources for you delivered to your inbox.
4. Find out first about the latest jobs in education