Skip to main content
article icon

Elites reach out to primaries

news | Published in TES magazine on 14 October, 2011 | By: David Rogers

World-famous independents, including Harrow and St Paul’s, are working on proposals to sponsor  “failing” state primaries as the Coalition encourages links between the two sectors 

As ministers have ratcheted up pressure in the last few weeks on major independent schools to forge closer links with the maintained sector, world-famous institutions including Harrow and St Paul’s have revealed they are working on proposals to take over “failing” primaries.

The move is in response to the Primary School Academy Group, an initiative unveiled by the Headmasters’ and Headmistresses’ Conference (HMC) last month to encourage top public schools to sponsor underperforming - or “below-the-floor” - primary schools. Now TES can reveal that some of the very best known schools of this kind - including Harrow, St Paul’s, Manchester Grammar and Dulwich College - are actively looking at the idea of setting up primary academies.

“We have got a number of schools that have expressed serious interest in sponsoring an academy,” said David Levin, headmaster of City of London School and chair of the new HMC group.

These schools are now set to speak to Department for Education sponsor broker Felicity Gillespie, whose role at the department is to line up sponsor schools with failing primaries.

Mr Levin previously sent a letter to all HMC schools asking them to consider sponsoring a primary. But he went further last week. “There are a number of factors as to why we should invest. It is part of our duty as citizens of this country. We need to give back to society to enhance social mobility. Academies are going to be a permanent part of the landscape. All political parties are in unanimous approval of academies.”

Mr Levin is considering personal sponsorship of a primary in south London because the governance structure of his own school makes it difficult for it to underake sponsorship. He hopes to have it in place by next September and said he hoped the involvement of independents would have the “blessing of local authorities”.

“Independents could take over a below-the-floor school and make changes from within. They would bring in their own staff, which would make them attractive to primary school teachers, who otherwise might have been put off going there.”

One school interested in sponsoring a primary academy is Harrow. Its new head, Jim Hawkins, said: “I understand the current Government’s desire to get some of the public school DNA into the state sector. Sponsoring an academy or free school is one possibility, but the relationship won’t be right if one side is feeling patronised. ‘Here we are, the wealthy school and we’re coming to help’ - that’s never going to work.”

The Independent Association of Prep Schools said it was close to announcing the name of its first member school to sponsor a primary.

The Government has increasingly been lobbying independents to get involved with underperforming state schools, and Mr Cameron told last week’s Conservative party conference: “I want to see private schools start academies and sponsor academies in the state sector. The apartheid between our private and state schools is one of the biggest wasted opportunities in our country today.”

The prime minister and Michael Gove recently held a summit with top independents on the subject, and HMC general secretary William Richardson admitted he expected to be asked for a progress report from the education secretary. But HMC chairman Ken Durham, who is also head of University College School in north London, warned the Government that independents should not be strong-armed into sponsoring academies. “If independent schools are to get involved in the state sector, it should be for education reasons. The idea that we should do it because somebody says we should, I don’t go for that.”

Free schools champion Toby Young, who is also hoping to persuade independents to set up free schools, said: “Privately, I’ve been approached by a number of (independent) headteachers about setting up free schools. But I don’t think independents would respond well to compulsion. They would feel harried and bullied by the state.”

But it is becoming clear that more and more independents will be expected to help struggling state schools - and increasingly, it seems, they see the best option is to take on primary schools.


Professor Robert Winston has attacked the founding in central London of the New College of the Humanities, a private university backed by philosopher AC Grayling.

The private college, which Professor Grayling said will be up and running next year, will charge students an annual fee of £18,000 but has said up to 30 per cent of the eventual 1,000 students will receive scholarships or assisted help - where the students pay the first £7,200 of the fees.

Professor Winston said he was not convinced Professor Grayling will be able to attract enough money to help bankroll the fees of poorer students.

“How is he going to get scholarships? A university has to be involved in research. Is he going to get researchers into there?

“I don’t believe scientists want to work in his university. Places like Imperial, Oxford and Cambridge have got the track records and the international status.”


Original headline: The top flight sets its sights on struggling primaries

Subscribe to the magazine

as yet unrated

Comment (2)

  • Could Cameron or Gove please explain the EXACT MECHANISM by which 'standards' are to be 'raised'.

    Independent schools are a socially exclusive organisations which serve a very small minority of wealthy socially privilaged 'elite'. State schools are not socially exclusive organisations. How EXACTLY have independent schools ANYTHING to offer the state sector? Are they going to send their socially exclusive children over to fill them? I doubt that.

    Now for the REAL BIT..............independent schools are charities in law (but not in actions). If they don't develop closer working relationship between the public and private sector they'll lose their charitable status. THIS is the crux; Cameron, Clegg & David Levin can tart-it-up how they like, they can pretend that the independent sector is out to save the state sector but what is really at stake is MONEY. If they lose charitable status they'll have a problem surviving.

    Cut the B-S and just get on with letting state schools use your swimming pools you horrible upper class twits! Stop pretending you are curing cancer!


    Independent schools have historically channelled their trading activities through a subsidiary company, given the direct tax limits on trading outside their charitable objects and the restrictions placed on trustees. The premise of setting up a trading company is that it will gift aid profits back to the school in order to avoid any exposure to corporation tax.

    If you are an Independent School want to know how to avoid tax have a look at

    Rather than having the RICHEST people in our society avoid tax on their eduacation (& thus have the poorest in society subsidising Eton!) why not impose the VAT on independent schools and use the money to fund the cuts in the state sector?

    After all:

    "I went to a fantastic school. I’m not embarrassed about that because I had a great education and I know what a great education means. And knowing what a great education means, means there’s a better chance of getting it for all of our children, which is absolutely what I want in this country" David Cameron at Tory party conferences 2009 and 2007.

    "There is lots of anger about higher education at the moment and I understand it. I am angry too. Here's what makes me angry. Oxford and Cambridge take more students each year from just two schools — Eton and Westminster — than from among the 80,000 pupils who are eligible for free school meals... These are the things that make me angry: these are the facts that would make me take to the streets; these are the injustices that our policy will remedy" Nick Clegg, Hugo Young lecture, November 2010

    "The risk now, given the new constraints on public spending, is that the [funding] gap between public and private sectors will be come a chasm" David Laws

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

    17 October, 2011

    Brooke Bond

  • BEAUTIFULLY articulated, Brooke Bond, and I agree wholeheartedly...
    and I am especially delighted at you use of the word 'twit'. I was saying only the other day how very under used it is these days.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

    21 October, 2011


Add your comment

Subscribe to TES magazine
Join TES for free now

Join TES for free now

Four great reasons to join today...

1. Be part of the largest network of teachers in the world – over 2m members
2. Download over 600,000 free teaching resources
3. Get a personalized email of the most relevant resources for you delivered to your inbox.
4. Find out first about the latest jobs in education