Academics `missing the point’

8th September 1995, 1:00am

Share

Academics `missing the point’

https://www.tes.com/magazine/archive/academics-missing-point
The letter on school-centred training from Cambridge academics (TES, September 1) leaves out some important differences between today’s school-centred initial teacher training (SCITT) and the pre-war variety which they have been researching.

The modern scheme is exclusively for graduates who will already have spent three years in higher education learning their subject, and must be in line with the Secretary of State’s criteria setting out the competences that all trainees must have in order to be awarded qualified teacher status. The academics also ignore the fact that virtually all the SCITT groups reported on have worked closely with higher education, had training delivered by higher education and offered postgraduate certificates in education validated by universities; and that the Office for Standards in Education report was about the scheme’s first year.

As OFSTED had not previously looked at the first year of new higher-education- based schemes it is impossible to make fair comparisons at this stage between SCITT and HE. It is disappointing that the academics should miss these points - let us hope it does not reflect a lack of objectivity.

ANTHEA MILLETT Chief executive Teacher Training Agency

Want to keep reading for free?

Register with Tes and you can read two free articles every month plus you'll have access to our range of award-winning newsletters.

Keep reading for just £1 per month

You've reached your limit of free articles this month. Subscribe for £1 per month for three months and get:

  • Unlimited access to all Tes magazine content
  • Exclusive subscriber-only stories
  • Award-winning email newsletters
Recent
Most read
Most shared