Auditors rewrite the league tables

28th November 2003, 12:00am

Share

Auditors rewrite the league tables

https://www.tes.com/magazine/archive/auditors-rewrite-league-tables
The report of the National Audit Office (page 1) is a stinging rebuke for the Office for Standards in Education, the Department for Education and Skills and the succession of ministers who have insisted that schools be judged without making adequate allowance for background factors which affect their performance on the grounds that “poverty is no excuse”. It provides some belated comfort for those schools which always knew that adverse circumstances beyond their control were not adequately taken into account when they were inspected or in the official performance tables.

The NAO is not in the business of excusing failure. Its role is to promote greater efficiency. Nor can Ofsted claim to have been unaware of the need to make more meaningful comparisons. The TES reported in 1996 that HM Inspectors were going to do just that. But the plan was disavowed by the then chief inspector, Chris Woodhead. And not until last year was a value-added element belatedly included in league tables.

The report concludes that Ofsted’s school ratings have continued to follow the raw results rather than show the extent to which schools were overcoming low prior attainment and disadvantage. The enormity of that misjudgment is now clear. One in 10 of the bottom 20 per cent in 2002 should in fact have been rated among the top 20 per cent of schools for effectiveness in GCSE, once such background factors were allowed for.

The cost of this policy is hard to quantify. The NAO and Ofsted agree that what makes a difference in schools is good leadership and teaching and a positive ethos. But how much more difficult has it been to attract good leaders and teachers and to stay positive in schools facing not only social and economic challenges but also an inspection and assessment system loaded against them? Is it a wonder the achievement gap has widened?

Those who teach in adverse circumstances deserve recognition for success against the odds, not a periodic rubbishing of their efforts from inspectors and an annual kick in the teeth from the league tables.

Want to keep reading for free?

Register with Tes and you can read two free articles every month plus you'll have access to our range of award-winning newsletters.

Keep reading for just £1 per month

You've reached your limit of free articles this month. Subscribe for £1 per month for three months and get:

  • Unlimited access to all Tes magazine content
  • Exclusive subscriber-only stories
  • Award-winning email newsletters
Recent
Most read
Most shared