Skip to main content

Bidders need all the information

Your report (TES, January 19) on the withdrawal of GrandMet Trust from its position as preferred bidder for the Careers Service in south London only 10 weeks before they were due to take over management of the service makes disturbing, but for those who have been involved, not entirely surprising reading.

One of the key elements in this bidding process has been the existence of the Transfer of Undertakings and Protection of Employment (TUPE), which requires the new contractor to take over responsibility for all existing staff, including accumulated pension and redundancy rights. However, it was not acknowledged officially that TUPE applied.

If this acknowledgement had been official, there would have been a requirement on the existing contractors to provide full information for other bidders on staff numbers, gradings and other aspects of employment costs. In fact, if this organisation's experience is anything to go by, the local authorities declined to give any of this information.

The result was that, to a large extent, alternative bids were on the basis of a theoretical model of the likely cost of managing the service.

The lesson from this is that if such services are put out to tender, the tendering procedure needs to be carefully thought through and local authorities, whose interest ought to be in public service and not in their own bureaucracy, should be obliged to make public relevant information.

Finally, the Government should have the courage of its convictions and encourage bidders to come up with new ways of addressing old problems to achieve agreed goals.

NEIL McINTOSH Chief executive Centre for British Teachers Education Services East Street Reading

Log in or register for FREE to continue reading.

It only takes a moment and you'll get access to more news, plus courses, jobs and teaching resources tailored to you