AELP urges government to ensure apprenticeship reforms don't hit social mobility

21st September 2017 at 00:02
Association of Employment and Learning Providers sets out 14 points which need to be addressed to ensure social equality is not affected by reform

Apprenticeship reform is affecting social equality and the government needs to get "a firm grip" on the policy to ensure social mobility, according to the Association of Employment and Learning Providers (AELP).

The organisation is today publishing a list of 14 points that need to be addressed if social equality is to not suffer as a result of the government's changes to the apprenticeship system. AELP chief executive Mark Dawe explained the message from Downing Street over the summer had been that social mobility was "still the number one priority for the government after securing a good deal for Brexit". 

He said education ministers, therefore, needed to "get a firm grip on the apprenticeship reforms to stop a potential haemorrhaging of young talent missing out on opportunities that employers were previously willing to offer", and that "the adult workforce needs apprenticeships too for business to meet the skills challenge."

"No big shake of the money tree is required to get these reforms on track but ministers do need to conduct a major reappraisal of where their priorities lie with apprenticeships if they are signed up to the prime minister’s agenda," Mr Dawe added.

According to AELP's submission, training providers report that employers are reducing recruitment young apprentices aged under 19 and at lower rungs of the apprenticeship ladder before they can progress upwards. According to government statistics, only 15 per cent of apprentices taken on since May of this year were aged 16 to 18. This, according to the AELP, was because the new levy funding system for apprenticeships had generated a set of incentives encouraging employers to focus their programmes on adults and at management level instead.  They also result in adults being given fewer opportunities in lower level apprenticeships to improve their skills.    

The submission adds people from disadvantaged backgrounds are let down by provision for improving their English and maths within an apprenticeship, as it is being funded at only half the classroom rate.

The AELP's 14 points for the government to address are:

  1. All 16-18 apprentices should be fully funded by the government, regardless of whether they are employed by a micro employer, an SME or a levy paying employer.
  2. The equalisation of funding for all apprentices of all ages leads to more older apprentices being selected.
  3. The compulsory employer contribution is a disincentive to hire an apprentice especially when additional work is required to support the most disadvantaged apprentices or younger apprentices with less initial work and life experience.
  4. Employers say that the rigid implementation of 20 per cent off-the-job training is “reducing our recruitment of level 2 apprentices”.
  5. Training time for maths and English is required in addition to the mandatory off-the-job training with the least able apprentices placing the heaviest burden on employers.
  6. Provider funding for maths and English in apprenticeships is miserly at only 50 percent of the classroom rate, below the cost of delivery and provides no incentive to take on the most challenging individuals.  Failure of maths or English leads to failure of the apprenticeship.
  7. The replacement of the previous sound system of disadvantage funding significantly reduces the funding for the individuals.
  8. There are still funding and performance monitoring disincentives with traineeships, an important transition programme, inhibiting their much-needed growth and development.
  9. Employer and provider young person incentives set at a flat rate of £1,000 rather than a proportion of the funding band are disadvantaging the longer more expensive programmes.
  10. Levy paying employers are prioritising existing employees for apprenticeships instead of recruiting new entrants and giving young people an opportunity, further restricting opportunities for young people.
  11. Levy paying employers are also prioritising higher and degree level apprenticeships over intermediate and advanced levels which are vital starting points for the young, the inexperienced and the disadvantaged.  
  12. ESFA is encouraging a shift in focus from SMEs and small employers to larger levy paying employers.
  13. A minimum contracting threshold of £200k, without allowing consortium bidding, has precluded around 300 existing providers from bidding in the recent non-levy apprenticeship funding tender and could also impact a further 200 through a pro-rata award due to oversubscription. Many of these training providers are niche specialists with many years’ experience of working with smaller employers and offering apprenticeships in their locality, supporting young and disadvantaged apprentices.
  14. Removal of nationally recognised qualifications from apprenticeship standards further reduces the mobility of the apprentice.

Want to keep up with the latest education news and opinion? Follow Tes FE News on Twitter, like us on Facebook and follow us on LinkedIn 

Comments

Related Content

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now