It’s no myth: superior O-level proves the system needs a rethink

20th November 2009, 12:00am

Share

It’s no myth: superior O-level proves the system needs a rethink

https://www.tes.com/magazine/archive/its-no-myth-superior-o-level-proves-system-needs-rethink-1

Adrian Elliott’s article ought to have been based upon an in-depth analysis of exam papers, in a range of different subjects. Instead, it is just too vague and anecdotal.

If you have not read or spoken a word of French since your O-level, a nine-year-old may actually have a better knowledge of French than you do, but that does not, in itself, prove that GCSE French is harder than the old O-level paper.

However, when a group of modern young people experienced what it was like to be at a grammar school in the 1950s on Channel 4‘s That’ll Teach ‘Em, some said, quite openly, that they thought the old O-level papers were much more difficult than today’s GCSE papers. As this group of youngsters were able to make valid comparisons, I would have thought that their opinions were worth listening to.

the hippo

From the forums (www.tes.co.ukmyths).

Want to keep reading for free?

Register with Tes and you can read two free articles every month plus you'll have access to our range of award-winning newsletters.

Keep reading for just £1 per month

You've reached your limit of free articles this month. Subscribe for £1 per month for three months and get:

  • Unlimited access to all Tes magazine content
  • Exclusive subscriber-only stories
  • Award-winning email newsletters
Recent
Most read
Most shared