Not evidence to support change

29th October 2004, 1:00am

Share

Not evidence to support change

https://www.tes.com/magazine/archive/not-evidence-support-change
The role of the National Foundation for Educational Research is to provide independent, evidence-based information to support policy-makers and practitioners.

The school term review set out to consider recent evidence, from the UK and abroad, relating to changes to the school calendar. It drew on research evidence and opinion-based material published in the five-year period from 1999-2003.

The review did not conclude that “changing to a similar arrangement in Britain would not have any impact on pupil achievement, attendance, motivation or exclusion”, as stated in the article.

It found that many of the issues surrounding calendar change had not been explicitly researched and that a large proportion of the available material was advocacy rather than research.

The review’s main finding was that there was simply not recent enough evidence of sufficient quality to answer the central questions concerning pupil achievement, motivation and attendance.

Caroline Sharp

Principal research officer

National Foundation for Educational Research

The Mere

Upton Park, Berkshire

Want to keep reading for free?

Register with Tes and you can read two free articles every month plus you'll have access to our range of award-winning newsletters.

Keep reading for just £1 per month

You've reached your limit of free articles this month. Subscribe for £1 per month for three months and get:

  • Unlimited access to all Tes magazine content
  • Exclusive subscriber-only stories
  • Award-winning email newsletters
Recent
Most read
Most shared