Protect the pre-pensioners

Tes Editorial

THE enormity of the impact of a 25 per cent reduction can only be appreciated after doing one or two calculations.

A 50-year-old on pound;28,000pa who still wanted to retire at 60 with comparable benefits would have to save an extra pound;500 a month! The corresponding amounts for a 40, 30 and 22-year-old would be pound;200, pound;100 and pound;50 respectively.

A final irony is that the pension rules would only allow them to save an extra pound;200 a month in additional voluntary contributions.

I worked in financial services for five years and learned the importance of long-term planning to achieve a decent pension.

However, it would be immoral to impose changes on older teachers for whom long-term planning is not possible.

I hope the working party will re-think their proposals and will drop changes to the pension rules for existing teachers. If they do go ahead with changes it is vital that they take into account the exponential effect of age as illustrated by the figures above.

Paul Tomlinson 36 Kilmiston Drive Portchester Fareham, Hampshire

Register to continue reading for free

It only takes a moment and you'll get access to more news, plus courses, jobs and teaching resources tailored to you

Tes Editorial

Latest stories

Teaching remotely

11 annoying moments from remote learning

The move to teaching remotely hasn’t been easy for school staff, but at least it has been memorable. Here are some of your tricky moments from the front line of lockdown learning this week
Joshua Lowe 16 Jan 2021

Coronavirus and schools: LIVE 15/1

A one-stop shop for teachers who want to know what impact the ongoing pandemic will have on their working lives
Tes Reporter 15 Jan 2021