Risks of 'patchwork' research

Sally Goddard Blythe & Peter Blythe

We were delighted to read the article "Academic who lost ability to read turns the page" (TESS, 27 April), but disappointed it said that "there is little definitive research into exactly how such initiatives work" and "a lack of evidence to show why they work". And there was no mention of other research and practice looking at the same areas.

The Institute for Neuro-Physiological Psychology (INPP) in Chester has spent more than 35 years developing ways to identify the underlying physical factors that can act as barriers to learning in children with reading and writing problems.

It is a pity that when mention is made of newer programmes or work such as the Primary Movement, cited in the article, the theoretical origins of these programmes are not also mentioned. Such omissions result in "patchwork" research, funding and practice.

Sally Goddard Blythe, Director, Institute for Neuro-Physiological Psychology, Chester; Peter Blythe, Founder, INPP.

Register to continue reading for free

It only takes a moment and you'll get access to more news, plus courses, jobs and teaching resources tailored to you

Sally Goddard Blythe & Peter Blythe

Latest stories

Schools need to be ready for any blame pushed onto teachers by unhappy pupils

GCSE results day 2021: How to handle TAG unhappiness

What should a teacher do if a student blames them for not getting the GCSE grade they think they deserve this year? Tes rounds up advice for those preparing for that possibility
Grainne Hallahan 5 Aug 2021
Teacher assessed grades, TAGs, results day 2021

SQA results day 2021: how we got here

It’s been a frenetic year – with exams were cancelled and the SQA due to be replaced – so here’s a recap of events on the road to results day
Emma Seith 5 Aug 2021