25 years ago

31st May 1996 at 01:00
In the dispute over cuts in school milk some people are moving the schools a step further in the takeover of responsibility. Often the argument has been that the home has lost its commanding grip, so school backed by state should step in and help the child.

Now with the Government cutting the milk supply, the school is seen as standing alone in the child's defence, and one suggestion is that this defence will be ensured by the banning of less helpful items from the school tuckshop.

In such a situation, do we envisage the local authority supporting the school in preventing children from going out at interval or lunchbreak to buy the harmful goodies from a local shop? But meantime profits from the tuckshop might suffer.

TES SCOTLAND, June 4, 1971

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today