30 years ago

17th February 2006 at 00:00
Criticism by Bill McKechin of Archbishop Thomas Winning over his statement on the duty of Roman Catholic parents to send their children to Catholic schools (TESS, last week) prompted a vigorous defence from Brian Gill, now Lord Gill, a leading advocate (TESS, February 20, 1976): I dispute the assumption that commitment and insight are true alternatives.

There is no reason why commitment to a clearly defined religious standpoint should necessarily deprive a child of insight into the general features of religion as a social phenomenon. I assert as a fact that that need not be and is not the effect of Catholic education. What evidence is there to the contrary?

I certainly dispute the assumption that Catholic education limits a child's religious education to a recital of the beliefs and practices of his religion. What evidence is there to support this assumption?

And, even if such a recital of beliefs and practices was the sum and substance of Catholic education (which is not the case), it by no means follows that the effect of it is to "abort" the possibility of the individual's religious development. Again, what evidence is there for such an assertion, and what does Mr McKechin mean by "religious development" in this argument?

Is it a maturing of a religious faith, in which case how can that be achieved in the young without instruction in the beliefs and practices of that religion? Or does "religious development" contain, as I suspect, a further covert assumption, namely that it refers to a desired maturing out of any specific sectarian allegiance?

Anyone pretending to serious participation in this debate has to come clean about these assumptions, because they are by no means too obvious for argument, least of all when they are prefaced by such question-begging propositions as that "in this ecumenical age" separate Catholic schools have an "inbuilt inward approach to separateness".

No one, so far as I am aware, has claimed that the abolition of the Catholic schools would mean the abolition of the Catholic Church in Scotland, but it would, in my view, gravely impair the Church's mission.

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now