From a dribble to a trickle

15th September 1995 at 01:00
I was very interested to read the comments of Sir Robert Balchin about the desirability of abolishing parental ballots to make it easier for schools to opt out (TES, September 1). Perhaps he forgot that in 1994, the first year in which every LEA school had to consider opting out, 99.1 per cent of their governing bodies rejected the idea. Abolishing the parental ballot would only increase the number of schools opting out from a dribble to a trickle.

Compelling schools to opt out sounds good in theory, but for grant-maintained schools to work, the governing body andor parents have got to be committed to such a move. What happens if faced with compulsion, governing bodies resign, or governors refuse to become first or foundation governors? You can take a horse to water, but . . .

And moreover, how would either scenario square with the Government's supposed commitment to parental choice?

ANGELA MILROY Vice chair Parents Opposed to Opting Out 3 Bellefield Crescent Trowbridge, Wiltshire

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today