From a dribble to a trickle

15th September 1995 at 01:00
I was very interested to read the comments of Sir Robert Balchin about the desirability of abolishing parental ballots to make it easier for schools to opt out (TES, September 1). Perhaps he forgot that in 1994, the first year in which every LEA school had to consider opting out, 99.1 per cent of their governing bodies rejected the idea. Abolishing the parental ballot would only increase the number of schools opting out from a dribble to a trickle.

Compelling schools to opt out sounds good in theory, but for grant-maintained schools to work, the governing body andor parents have got to be committed to such a move. What happens if faced with compulsion, governing bodies resign, or governors refuse to become first or foundation governors? You can take a horse to water, but . . .

And moreover, how would either scenario square with the Government's supposed commitment to parental choice?

ANGELA MILROY Vice chair Parents Opposed to Opting Out 3 Bellefield Crescent Trowbridge, Wiltshire

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now