A reading test that's hard to comprehend

25th March 2011 at 00:00

Teachers need to take into account the very varied range of experience of oracy as well as literacy that individual children have before they come to school. It would be a tragedy if the breadth of this experience were restricted by a test that would force an emphasis on a limited and limiting programme, with little time for consolidation or understanding. The idea of including non-words is particularly unhelpful at a time when children are actively seeking meaning.

It would be preferable to trust teachers' professional judgment as to which of a variety of potential interventions would be most effective at KS1 and beyond. These could take account of those who are already fluent readers, those learning English as an additional language, and any who have special needs, including children with low self-esteem who find tests very challenging. This last group is likely to increase if present plans are pushed through, without regard for the evidence.

Wendy Scott, President, TACTYC: Association for the Professional Development of Early Years Educators.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today