A studied insult

4th May 2001 at 01:00
Basic skills tests for new teachers received almost universal approval in the consultation over the Government's Green Paper on modernising the teaching profession. Which just shows that all of the supposedly important people can be wrong at least some of the time. Of course every teacher should be literate and numerate. But why should the profession that expects every other calling to accept its GCSEs as an indication of just that, undermine the credibility of its own exams and the national curriculum byrequiring a specific test of literacy and numeracy?

Teachers may require a higher standard, or particular statistical or language skills. But what is it about maths and English that makes them any different from the other professional skills new teachers are supposed to be taught and tested upon as part of their training? Why are tacked-on tests not necessary in Wales or Scotland? These tests are inappropriate, unfair, and a studied insult to the profession. They should be quietly dropped.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today