Academic prowess is not a reflection of ability to work

28th August 2009 at 01:00

Most parents would be horrified to read the article "Girls' science should cover sex and masturbation" (August 14). They send their children in trust to be educated, but the sex free-for-all attitude has so damaged some girls that by the time they are 18 they are no longer fit to be a wife, mother or daughter.

I spent my working life in areas with huge social problems and, as a head, I had young single mums crying in my office, in utter distress because their lives were unbearable. They had been let down by our society.

Young girls should not be made to feel they are just sex objects and the breakdown of family life with all the social problems this causes won't be improved by schemes of this nature. There has never been so much sex education in schools. There have never been so many teenage pregnancies. Could there be some connection between the two?

Mrs ML Cook, Cottingham, Hull.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today