Ad hominem arguments?

23rd June 1995 at 01:00
Martin Lightfoot seems to dislike the School Curriculum and Assessment Authority chief executive Dr Nicholas Tate giving some friendly advice to teachers of classics about how (in his opinion) they might argue effectively for their subject and work it into the timetable (TES, June 9). He is hostile to Dr Tate's arguments and claims that Latin was once used as a weapon in the class war.

There are indeed good and bad arguments for teaching classics, and Latin has always been taught more in public than in state schools (if that is what Mr Lightfoot means by his feeble "class war" assertion).

But it is not the subject's fault if it is badly justified or taught only in public schools; and the main purpose of Dr Tate's address was, after all, to invite state school teachers to think of ways to redress the balance.

PETER JONES Department of Classics University of Newcastle

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now