2nd September 2005 at 01:00
Joan Sallis Answers your questions

I am head of a large, tough comprehensive. My governors are pressing me to disclose staff absences. Some of my staff find the job stressful and get run down but I don't want to make it harder by harrying them. Am I within my rights to refuse to provide this information?

When I was a member of a governing body, we had a co-opted governor who was a human resources manager in business and who was shocked that we didn't have a formal system for discussing staff absence. The staff governors looked equally shocked by the suggestion that we should. It is now more common for this to be an accepted part of governors' monitoring role.

At the very least I would think the overall level of absence should be part of the head's regular report to governors, with no intention of highlighting individuals who had been unfortunate enough to have a lot of sickness, and not in any punitive spirit either, unless the head thought there was a problem which needed attention. The job is stressful and teachers work very hard. Infections are also passed round more easily than in other workplaces. But the governing body must function as employer and this is a normal part of management information from which one can learn a great deal.

Figures by department can highlight general problems which may need to be addressed (like staffing levels and organisation of ability groups). It does not take a genius to expect higher levels in departments where recruitment in the subject areas is particularly difficult. Even movements in total levels, as long as one makes allowances for any obvious contributory factors, can be informative. Areas which are in management control (like timetables and organisation of students) may make a difference.

A head, deputy or departmental head may interview staff returning after absence to bring to light any problems arising from the job andor are within management's power to alleviate. I also think it is good for head and governors to discuss and have open policies on compassionate leave, attitude towards staff response to their children's illnesses, and so on.

More openness about sickness absence can be a positive force for school improvement and staff well-being, and may even lead to helpful thinking about school and LEA policies.

Questions for Joan Sallis should be sent to The TES, Admiral House, 66-68 East Smithfield, London E1W 1BX, fax 0171 782 32023205, or see governorsask_ the_expert where answers to submitted questions will appear

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today