Aim to improve Blair's image?;Letter

26th March 1999 at 00:00
AS A CHAIRMAN of governors I enthusiastically welcomed this Government's commitment to "education, education, education". Unfortunately, recent events have left me wondering whether its real priority is not "image, image, image".

Last year my school was required to set targets for pupil achievement at key stage 2 in 2000. After the school's senior management team had spent some considerable time assessing the strengths and weaknesses of the current cohort, provisional targets were drawn up, and these were then discussed with and agreed by our LEA adviser. They were then additionally presented to, debated by and approved by the governing body.

Now the Government has sent down an edict to the county demanding that targets be revised upwards. For whose benefit is this move? For children and schools or for the Government's image?

The Rev Dr Simon Coupland

Chairman of governors

Broadwater CE first and middle school

Worthing, West Sussex

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today