Ask the students how to improve

10th February 2006 at 00:00
Colleges should make more effort to stimulate student feedback, an HMIE report has urged. Inspectors call for further improvements, including evaluation by students of teaching they receive.

While students are represented on boards of management and course committees, the impact they make is patchy - often due to the nature of the student population in further education.

The report, Student Representation in Scottish Further Education Colleges, states that students often found board of management meetings intimidating.

"It was difficult for them to contribute confidently without effective induction, training and support," it states.

More productive work was done by students on course committees, which was valued by staff. Here, too, "it was difficult for colleges to get some groups of students to participate and student attendance at meetings was often erratic". Part-timers, online learners and those in outreach centres often missed out.

Questionnaires did not impress inspectors as a means of finding out what students were thinking. Focus groups were preferred as an effective way of seeking more reflective views.

Some colleges are singled out for their efforts. John Wheatley in Glasgow, HMIE found last year, "used a good range of methods to gather the views of learners and staff on the learning experience and the provision of key support services". This included class representation on course committees and in focus groups.

Angus College, also inspected last year, receives feedback from students on programme teams, and issues regular questionnaires.

The former Falkirk College was found by HMIE in 2004 to have a "high commitment by all staff to obtaining and analysing regular feedback from students".

But even where there was good feedback, most colleges did not have systems in place for ensuring views were collated on a college-wide basis.

While most learners appeared to be content with the ways open to them to raise issues of concern, "across the sector apathy and lack of commitment within certain groups of students, and college systems that did not fully involve all sectors of the student population, reduced the overall impact of representation".

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today