Ban indiscipline, not football

18th March 2005 at 00:00
By blaming football for a corrupting influence on children, Martin Ward of the Secondary Heads Association is very much placing the chicken before the egg. The undisciplined and abusive footballers in the media spotlight are young men who until recently were exhibiting exactly the same behaviour in schools for exactly the same reason; namely, they were allowed to get away with it.

As with schoolchildren, the minority of footballers who choose to behave inappropriately receive a disproportionate amount of attention. To suggest that these players mean that football should be shown after the 9pm watershed, is to ignore the myriad positive aspects of the game.

Further, to show football later would be to impose a collective punishment of the type that Mr Ward's colleagues would hopefully discourage in the classroom. It would also be a counterproductive punishment, as it might increase the number of children staying up too late on school days.

Andy Conner

180 Shenstone Road

Edgbaston, Birmingham

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now