Bearing the cost of capital inequality

20th March 2009 at 00:00

At a time when the Government is committed to a major investment in public capital investment as a way of supporting the economy and Harriet Harman is seeking to introduce new legislation to promote equality in the public sector, I believe the FE capital debacle is damaging to the Government's ambitions. This must especially be the case with the next general election looming.

While the problem has been made far worse by the Learning and Skills Council's continued approval of schemes regardless of the funding actually available, this should also be set against other significant injustices to our sector, including no free school meals for FE students, the requirement to pay VAT and the funding gap for carrying out identical work as school sixth forms. Even if capital is available, the support for colleges is almost always well below that received for schools, often as little as 10 per cent against the 100 per cent given for the schools sector.

It is particularly sad that such inequality of treatment exists in Lancashire, where five out of six young people study in FE as opposed to the school sector.

Ian Clinton, Principal and chief executive, Blackburn College, Lancashire.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today