Best curriculum would be slim but traditional

11th February 2011 at 00:00

Anyone who works in or around education starts to get a little wary of admonitions along the lines of "we must provide young people with the skills they need for the 21st century".

In this vein, Helen Flynn (Letters, 14 January) goes as far as to suggest we begin a "sober appraisal of the skills our young people need ... so that they can be adaptable in a whole host of difficult-to-predict and unimagined scenarios". Surely such an appraisal, if it were truly sober, would admit that we can't predict very well what skills young people will need in the future?

This throws us back to providing them with the basic capabilities to learn those skills as and when it becomes apparent just what they are. And rather than point necessarily to "innovation", supplying such capabilities could just as easily point towards more traditional academic subjects. Since there is good evidence that the latter prepare young people well for the 21st-century labour market, surely the answer is a national curriculum that has a core of traditional subjects but is slimmed down enough to allow for innovation, too?

Dr Matt Grist, Senior researcher, Demos.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today