Better left in the dark?

18th April 2003 at 01:00
Telling teenagers they need advice and counselling to get them through their exams may do more harm than good, a study in England has found.

Intervention may mean that young people accept the judgment, lose motivation and turn a prediction into reality.

The first Underaspirers experiment, run by the CEM Centre at Durham University, identified a group of 14-16s who appeared to be turned off by education. Schools were told about them but not about a similar group which was tracked.

When GCSE exam results were compared, the pupils who had been identified and received more counselling did significantly worse.

However, an updated study among 23 schools south of the border is about to show a different set of results. Fourteen schools which worked with named pupils turned in positive results while nine did not.

A third study is under way.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today