Better left in the dark?

18th April 2003 at 01:00
Telling teenagers they need advice and counselling to get them through their exams may do more harm than good, a study in England has found.

Intervention may mean that young people accept the judgment, lose motivation and turn a prediction into reality.

The first Underaspirers experiment, run by the CEM Centre at Durham University, identified a group of 14-16s who appeared to be turned off by education. Schools were told about them but not about a similar group which was tracked.

When GCSE exam results were compared, the pupils who had been identified and received more counselling did significantly worse.

However, an updated study among 23 schools south of the border is about to show a different set of results. Fourteen schools which worked with named pupils turned in positive results while nine did not.

A third study is under way.

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now