For better or worse, modern grammars have moved on

4th December 2009 at 00:00

I was amused and annoyed to read Adrian Elliott's "Myth: 'A return to grammar schools would improve standards and social mobility'", November 27). Every time anyone writes about grammar schools, there is the obligatory interview with someone who attended one in the 1950s. Get real - that was 50 years ago. Grammar schools have moved on, as have other schools.

My daughter attends a very good grammar school in Kent, and my son has just passed the Kent test, so will be going there next year. About 99 per cent of pupils there get five GCSE passes including English and maths, so it is ludicrous to bring up the 1959 figure of nearly 40 per cent failing to pass three O-levels.

At their grammar school, many students pass at least 10 GCSEs, among which they can do drama and PE - not everything has to be academic. My daughter is enjoying school very much, mainly as the other students actually want to work, instead of spending their time harassing the teachers.

What we need is a fair debate, with views from people on both sides of the fence.

Beth Cavendish, Adult educator, Kent.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today