Blunkett wrong on targets

7th January 2005 at 00:00
There is a dangerous implication in David Blunkett's belief "that he could have achieved the 2001 numeracy and literacy targets" (TES, December 17), namely that he had a hand in the level of achievement.

In 1999 the accusation was made that the levels of achievement in national tests were being manipulated for political purposes. The Rose inquiry (published under the title Weighing the Baby) demonstrated that this was not true. Threshold scores for each national curriculum level were and are set by the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority based on statistical and empirical evidence.

As the person accountable at QCA for that process in 2001 I can assure Mr Blunkett that the evidence was clear: for all the effort and skill being put in by teachers and pupils, progress was being made towards the targets but they had not been reached.

Tim Cornford. General manager, nferNelson. The Chiswick Centre. 414 Chiswick High Road. London W4

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now