Blunkett wrong on targets

7th January 2005 at 00:00
There is a dangerous implication in David Blunkett's belief "that he could have achieved the 2001 numeracy and literacy targets" (TES, December 17), namely that he had a hand in the level of achievement.

In 1999 the accusation was made that the levels of achievement in national tests were being manipulated for political purposes. The Rose inquiry (published under the title Weighing the Baby) demonstrated that this was not true. Threshold scores for each national curriculum level were and are set by the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority based on statistical and empirical evidence.

As the person accountable at QCA for that process in 2001 I can assure Mr Blunkett that the evidence was clear: for all the effort and skill being put in by teachers and pupils, progress was being made towards the targets but they had not been reached.

Tim Cornford. General manager, nferNelson. The Chiswick Centre. 414 Chiswick High Road. London W4

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today