Board decision for recovery

23rd January 2004 at 00:00
It is implied in your article "Principal sacked over redundancy row reinstated as inquiry ordered" (FE Focus January 9) that Mr O'Keeffe's employment was terminated because he proposed to make members of the college's senior management team redundant and that the senior managers referred to in your article were instrumental in bringing about Mr O'Keeffe's dismissal.

It should be made clear that the dismissal was instigated and managed by the Salisbury College board of corporation.

The four senior managers had no involvement in the reasons behind the board's decision and were reinstated to facilitate the operational management of the college.

Over the past two months the college management, the staff and external consultants have worked to support the board of corporation to develop a viable recovery strategy for the college to ensure financial stability and success in the future.

Sophie DiLeo

Board of Corporation

Salisbury College


Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today