A child, particularly a young one, will commonly speak not of "our teacher" but, proudly, of "my teacher". That hint of a special, possessive relationship is at the heart of these lectures given by George Steiner at Harvard University last year analysing the age-old relationship between the charismatic "master" - examples include Jesus, Socrates, Virgil, Kepler and Heidegger - and the individual pupil.
It's a densely argued book, but in its affirmation of pedagogy it's timely, given current emphasis on how children learn and the growth of "e-learning". In Steiner's words, "To teach seriously is to lay hands on what is most vital in a human being; to seek access to the quick and the innermost of a child's or an adult's integrity."
He goes on: "Bad teaching is, almost literally, murderous and, metaphorically, a sin." True - but readers might take issue with his assessment that such "anti-teaching is statistically close to being the norm." Is there nothing acceptable between charismatic mastery and its murderous opposite?