Did you vote `yes'?
dominiesbairn: I voted "yes" in the EIS ballot because the "no" campaign were not explaining what their alternative was, beyond "don't change anything or we'll take action". Had there been a constructive proposal which resolved whether NQTs such as myself can expect permanent jobs in the future, I would have voted for it. I felt that voting "no" would only destabilise things further.
halfajack: I just firmly believed that I should not vote for a set of proposals that would have one set of colleagues treated less fairly than another.
airy: What Cosla suggests isn't a year-long plan to save a wee bit of money but a sustained attack to permanently reduce the salary bill, de- skill teaching so that they can employ unqualified staff and put cost above education.
leesey: Everyone in the country is having to take a cut in some way or another.
airy: Are they? Anyone who thinks a salary cut would be reversed is living in La-la land.
leesey: Anyone who thinks any of this will ever return to normal is living in the same place, I'm afraid.
catmother: The fact that supply and permanent teachers are arguing on TES (to talk about this) proves that Cosla have done their jobs very well. Divide and conquer at its best.
To read more about this and other issues on the forums, visit www.tes.co.ukscotland.