Children's rights made clear

12th April 1996 at 01:00
Following your article headlined "Children's rights a recipe for confusion" (TESS, March 29), there are two points of clarification I would wish to make regarding the references made to my contribution.

I did not suggest that the decision in opening records would be made "on the resources available" nor is this a view which I hold. I did suggest that on occasions demands for recording may be driven by a parental perception of "guaranteed additionality". I also made reference to the issue of resources both with regard to mainstream provision, given that the number of recorded young people may have increased, and the increase in cost of specialist provision from areas within the independent sector.

On the subject of children's rights I endorsed explicitly the principles of the Children (Scotland) Act and the UN Convention on Children's Rights. The confusion which I identified sought to cross-refer the explicit rights within the Children Act set against current education statute which is largely predicated on parents rights rather than those of children.

BOB McKAY Director of education Perth and Kinross

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today