Children's rights made clear

12th April 1996 at 01:00
Following your article headlined "Children's rights a recipe for confusion" (TESS, March 29), there are two points of clarification I would wish to make regarding the references made to my contribution.

I did not suggest that the decision in opening records would be made "on the resources available" nor is this a view which I hold. I did suggest that on occasions demands for recording may be driven by a parental perception of "guaranteed additionality". I also made reference to the issue of resources both with regard to mainstream provision, given that the number of recorded young people may have increased, and the increase in cost of specialist provision from areas within the independent sector.

On the subject of children's rights I endorsed explicitly the principles of the Children (Scotland) Act and the UN Convention on Children's Rights. The confusion which I identified sought to cross-refer the explicit rights within the Children Act set against current education statute which is largely predicated on parents rights rather than those of children.

BOB McKAY Director of education Perth and Kinross

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now