9th October 2009 at 01:00

We would like to clarify that the article "Parents who teach pupils at home to be vetted" (June 12) did not intend to suggest a direct causal connection between the Baby P case and the Badman review of home education, nor that the review was linked to DCSF guidance, mentioned separately in the article, about safeguarding children involved in prostitution. We would also like to clarify that the statement that "approximately 35,000 children are not receiving a basic education" was an extrapolation, based on the maximum figure cited for home-educated pupils and personal estimates from four home education inspectors. As the Badman review noted, the total number of home-educated children remains unknown. About 20,000 home-educated children are currently known to local authorities nationwide.

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now