9th October 2009 at 01:00

We would like to clarify that the article "Parents who teach pupils at home to be vetted" (June 12) did not intend to suggest a direct causal connection between the Baby P case and the Badman review of home education, nor that the review was linked to DCSF guidance, mentioned separately in the article, about safeguarding children involved in prostitution. We would also like to clarify that the statement that "approximately 35,000 children are not receiving a basic education" was an extrapolation, based on the maximum figure cited for home-educated pupils and personal estimates from four home education inspectors. As the Badman review noted, the total number of home-educated children remains unknown. About 20,000 home-educated children are currently known to local authorities nationwide.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today