1st December 1995 at 00:00
No doubt questioning the details of a "seismic shift in culture" (TES, November 17) lays one open to accusations of l`ese-majeste.

However, I find it impossible to read Professor Michael Barber's twin assertion of an acceptance by all political parties that everyone is entitled to high standards combined with a claim that the Labour party has stated "its intention to argue for success for everyone and mean it" (sic), without wondering how this uniformly high standard will be mediated through the new two-tier system of "foundation" and "community" schools being proposed by the next Labour government.

Comparisons with the present voluntary-aided category are meaningless as the latter status is purchased through a 15 per cent contribution to the upkeep of the external fabric, a mechanism which is conspicuous by its absence in the Labour party's plans.

Just why do we need two categories of comprehensive schools, and how can the Labour party and its principal advisers argue for a new separate-but-equal type of provision in our present society, which is already chronically class- riddled?

JAMES SCOTT 29 Lady Margaret Road Crawley Sussex

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now