Clearly not so

8th November 1996 at 00:00
From Andrew Turner.

The chairman of education for Gloucestershire claims (TES, Letters, October 4) that the county is "maximising spending on schools".

The evidence is to the contrary. In 1995-96, its top slice was nearly 21 per cent of the education standard spending assessment. That is the fifth highest of the 22 local education authorities, shire and metropolitan, in which the Common Funding Formula was used to distribute money to grant-maintained secondary schools (source: Parliamentary Answers, April 3 and 19 1996). In Wiltshire and Essex, the figures were 16 per cent and 17 per cent respectively.

These figures have only recently become available in this transparent form. If Gloucestershire has achieved a better place in the league table for this year, not only would I be pleased to hear of it, but I am sure that Gloucestershire schools would be pleased to benefit from it.

ANDREW TURNER Director, Grant-Maintained Schools Foundation, 36 Great Smith Street, London SW1.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?

Subscribe

To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers

Comments

Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
 
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today