Clinton urged to reconsider cost of cutting class sizes

30th April 1999 at 01:00
The Clinton administration is being advised to think hard about the cost-effectiveness of its class-size reduction policy before it authorises any spending.

Researchers looking at the implications of a limit of 18 pupils per class in grades 1-3 (six to eight-year-olds) estimate that it will cost $5-6 billion (pound;3.2-pound;3.8bn) a year.

That would be the equivalent of $10,000 per teacher in grades 1-3. It is now argued that it might be better to invest this money in the professional development of existing teachers.

A nationwide pupil limit of 18 could only be introduced if another 100,000 teachers were recruited. It is surmised that this figure would not be reached unless teacher salaries were increased, costing an additional $1bn. Precise calculations are, however, impossible because the Federal government has not provided specific guidance on how the policy is to be adopted. It is, for example, not known whether the arrival of a 19th child would trigger the creation of a second class.

California's 20-pupils-per-infant-class limit means another class has to be formed when that figure is breached. The policy is costing the state $1.5bn a year. Experience there also suggests that new teachers are more likely to end up working in the most disadvantaged schools while more "marketable" staff migrate to better areas.

Tom Parrish of American Institute's Research told the conference that rising enrolment over the next 10 years would also be costly. Even without the additional accommodation it would cost about $30bn. But some savings might be made if more children got a better start in smaller classes. This could result in fewer pupils on remedial programmes and a reduction in the number of students forced to repeat a year.

"What remains in doubt is whether reducing the size of grades 1-3 classes is the most cost-effective approach to producing better high school graduates," he said.

"Three things should be considered - targeting reading instruction, flexibility in the implementation of the policy, and continuing evaluation of the programme."

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now