College backlash over plans to shake up internal assessment

15th June 2001 at 01:00
THE Education Minister's attempts to placate teachers' anger over the burden of internal assessment in schools (page four) will meet stiff resistance from FE colleges.

Tom Kelly, chief officer of the Association of Scottish Colleges, took a dim view this week of proposals to do away with summative assessment of the units which go to make up the Higher Still courses, now known as National Qualifications (NQs).

Colleges fear this could spell the end of attempts to win "parity of esteem" between vocational and academic courses.

"We are happy to go along with efforts to improve the NQ framework, such as tackling over-assessment, but we are in no way committed to changes in the NQ framework," Mr Kelly said. "That is a vital distinction for us. I don't see how you can do away with the formal assessment of units and still have the same framework."

He said changes could not be introduced willy-nilly for next year's exam diet because teaching towards certification had already begun. "Rushing into changes because of pressure from one group is not the way to do it," Mr Kelly said, "and at the very least there must be a risk assessment to ensure there is no detriment to FE students where people stick to the existing arrangements."

The association, which has its annual conference in Glasgow today (Friday), is concerned that there could be three different certificates next year - SCE, new NQs and variant new NQs. "The credibility of national certification, already under strain because of the exams crisis, could be further eroded," Mr Kelly said.

Iain Ovens, principal of Dundee Collee, who sits on the National Qualifications steering group which recommended a streamlined system at its meeting last week, said that there was widespread concern that FE could be seriously disadvantaged. The units were the "building blocks" of the NQ framework.

"I am concerned that if we abandon internal assessment and external assessment as equal and valued aspects of the system, we will lose a major opportunity," Mr Ovens said. "We will be back to a two-track approach, one which values internal assessment and one which doesn't.

"If external assessment is seen as the preferred route, there is the danger that those who are internally assessed will be regarded as having something inferior. Where is parity of esteem then?"

Mr Ovens added: "It is fundamental to lifelong learning that people can gain valuable qualifications one unit at a time."

Meanwhile lecturers at last weekend's Educational Institute of Scotland conference in Perth (pages four and five) reflected the school-college divide.

Kirsty Devaney, a Dundee College lecturer, said any boycott of internal assessment, as agreed by delegates, would penalise FE students taking free-standing units "with no intention of taking an external exam".

The number of students following Higher Still units in colleges was far greater than the number of school students taking Highers in S5 and S6. There were students taking core skills units, others with special educational needs following Access 3 courses and large numbers of adult returners.

Courses would be impossible to deliver if a boycott went ahead.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today