Course credits scheme fails users, says Ofqual

3rd June 2011 at 01:00
Blow to `bite-sized learning' as benefits - and cost to sector - of QCF are thrown into doubt

A multi-million pound qualifications framework designed to promote bite-sized learning is failing to give students "meaningful opportunities" to gain credits and transfer between courses, according to a damning report published today.

While recognising the potential benefits of the qualifications and credit framework (QCF), Ofqual concluded there is no "significant demand" for the flexible transfer of credits and has raised doubts about the benefits of the scheme.

The strict regulation of the QCF has stifled innovation, the exams regulator warned, and it raised concerns about awarding bodies being compelled to use units that they "did not consider to be fully fit for purpose".

"Many awarding organisations reported that they had incurred substantial costs as a result of the introduction of the QCF," its report said. "They did not know whether their investment in designing their qualifications in line with the QCF would prove to be worthwhile."

Mark Dawe, chief executive of exam board OCR, welcomed Ofqual's report and called for "marked improvements".

"The design specification was faulty from the outset and we are glad that Ofqual has now exposed its faults," he said.

Mr Dawe said OCR shared Ofqual's concerns in a number of key areas, including an "unreasonable" timetable for implementation; the "wasteful" level of administration involved in converting qualifications to the new system; the role of sector skills councils in approving qualifications adding "little value"; and confusion between exam boards offering similar courses.

When the Labour government unveiled the QCF in 2008, it argued that the new structure would bring together all vocational qualifications for the first time, recognising smaller units of learning and enabling students to build up qualifications in stages. Credits are awarded for completion of a unit, which can then be combined to complete a full qualification.

In October, the Association of Accounting Technicians told FE Focus that it had paid pound;900,000 to transfer its qualifications to the QCF, with little benefit.

The cost for larger exam boards is believed to run into millions of pounds.

Ofqual also found that even some "key stakeholders" were "largely unaware of the QCF".

A Skills Funding Agency spokesman said: "The work to build the QCF has been critical in moving us forward. Ofqual's evaluation highlights where we need to continue to focus energies to deliver a qualifications system that is flexible, responsive and innovative."

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today