Crime of British boy soldiers

30th April 2004 at 01:00
Coming from a family who have fought in two World Wars, we fully agree that the British Army is the 'most professional in the world' (TES, April 16).

Unfortunately, it is clear that there are failures in the Army's "duty of care" as employers. Events such as the Deepcut barracks deaths and that Britain, until this Iraq War, continued to send under-age soldiers to battle zones, gives us grave misgivings. Britain was the only Western nation to continue to send those under age into combat, despite the UN prohibiting it. Boys of 17 were killed in the Falklands and the Gulf War in 1991.

Even in World War 1, it was not permitted by British military law to send those under-age into battle zones, yet they did and it caused a scandal in Parliament. Four of these boys were unjustly shot at dawn. The only lesson learned is that we now no longer execute our own!

Doreen Jansen 'An Cuan'

465 Wickham Road Croydon

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today