Critical thinking given a bad name

18th December 2009 at 00:00

I am a little perplexed that Marj Adams, as a teacher of philosophy, suggested in her column on the review of teacher education (December 4) that "the theory of pedagogy is far removed from the practice of it".

To me, this seems to be a philosophical turkey voting for Christmas, given that one of the main purposes of philosophy is to explore the assumed interface between metaphysical and ethical world views and human behaviour.

To my knowledge, it is years since Marj has had a student teacher in her department. Perhaps a future student placement would add a little gravitas to her observations about teacher training.

Criticality is a key part of what I instil in student teachers, but I am concerned that the reactionary, selective and oppositional tone of Marj's columns may give critical thinking a bad name.

Graeme Nixon, lecturer, religious, moral and philosophical studies, University of Aberdeen.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today