Crying out for a break from Ofsted's 'overblown regime'

15th January 2010 at 00:00

It doesn't surprise me that CfBT is so lax in its employment of inspectors ("Ofsted inspector had conviction for unacceptable teaching conduct", January 8).

After a CfBT inspection of my school in July 2009, I submitted a complaint that one of the recommendations regarding the foundation stage was entirely unfounded.

My complaint was upheld with an apology and I was assured in writing that the wording of the recommendation would be changed. I agreed to the new wording, but on publication the wording remained unchanged. To add insult to injury, the draft report was published before the agreed date and had to be withdrawn with an apology.

Last week's article served to confirm my opinion that CfBT's standards are perfectly in line with Ofsted's ... dismal.

Kath Coyle, Headteacher, Aintree Davenhill Primary School, Merseyside.

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now