Crying out for a break from Ofsted's 'overblown regime'

15th January 2010 at 00:00

It doesn't surprise me that CfBT is so lax in its employment of inspectors ("Ofsted inspector had conviction for unacceptable teaching conduct", January 8).

After a CfBT inspection of my school in July 2009, I submitted a complaint that one of the recommendations regarding the foundation stage was entirely unfounded.

My complaint was upheld with an apology and I was assured in writing that the wording of the recommendation would be changed. I agreed to the new wording, but on publication the wording remained unchanged. To add insult to injury, the draft report was published before the agreed date and had to be withdrawn with an apology.

Last week's article served to confirm my opinion that CfBT's standards are perfectly in line with Ofsted's ... dismal.

Kath Coyle, Headteacher, Aintree Davenhill Primary School, Merseyside.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today