Cut down to size

7th February 1997 at 00:00
I began to read the article on class size conducted by the Tennessee Research Project (TES, January 24) with great interest, as I admit teaching my class of 37 Year 45s is a frustrating experience a great deal of the time as I am unable to give the children the time and attention they require.

I stopped reading in disbelief when I read that the children in the study had been allocated to either classes of 15 or 24, or 24 plus classroom assistant. So what this research actually discovered is that there is very little difference in progress between children in tiny classes and children in small classes.

Please can we have some research done on children in small classes (24 would do nicely) and children in classes well over 30? Then perhaps the findings would not only be more realistic, but also in line with what all teachers, and most parents, know for a fact ie, children in large classes over 30 are at a disadvantage.

PAT DOWNES Gorsthills Primary Berry Drive Great Sutton South Wirral

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today