The difference is objectivity

1st December 1995 at 00:00
As a chair of governors and an Office for Standards in Education lay inspector, I am surprised by the comments of the anonymous primary headteacher (TES, Letters, November 17) who was amazed that documents which found favour with his or her OFSTED inspectors were not so well received when passed to a colleague and resubmitted unchanged to a different inspection team at another school.

Every school is different and a school's documentation needs to relate to its specific and individual circumstances. The process of developing its policies as a whole school, rather than being handed them ready written, is commonly reflected in the extent to which policies are appropriate for a school, and the consistency of their application. I therefore find it difficult to share the headteacher's amazement that an OFSTED team at a different school, in different circumstances, should arrive at different conclusions.

The headteacher felt that this was evidence of OFSTED's lack of objectivity, but surely this is evidence (if secondhand information is evidence of anything) supporting entirely the opposite conclusion?

DENNIS JENNER 6 Driffield Road Bow, London

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today