Dishonest to two decimal places

19th November 2004 at 00:00
Would it really be sensible to replace degree classifications by some other system, supposedly objective and more fine-grained?

Percentage marks do not and should not possess the kind of objectivity that would support their use in selection for jobs or other purposes.

Looking at the study by John Curran, published in The Times Higher Education Supplement ("First could be given for 51 per cent", November 5), one could conclude that it is much harder to get a first at London Metropolitan University than at the London School of Economics. Informed academic judgment would perceive the reverse to be the case.

We should be honest with employers, students and government: at university level, it is neither possible nor desirable to mark objectively, and honours are a mark of respect, not a measure of quality.

The introduction of grade-point averages to two decimal places would be spurious accuracy and a dishonest attempt to represent academic judgments as possessing the status of scientific measurement.

Julian Newman

Glasgow Caledonian University

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today