Divided by ten

16th January 1998 at 00:00
The National Curriculum turned primary teachers into Renaissance men and women, with 10 subjects at their fingertips in enough depth to stretch even the brightest 10-year-old.

No wonder they are tired and flagging, and newly-qualified teachers feel overwhelmed by how much they need to know.

Many will be relieved by the Government's proposals, announced this week, that the national curriculum load should be lightened from September, to clear the way for increased emphasis on the three Rs.

Primary teachers will have to cover the full programme of study only for English, maths, science and information technology. Schools will have to teach the remaining subjects, but in less detail if they choose.

Most teachers - and ministers - will want to retain the entitlement to a broad curriculum promised by the 1988 Education Act. So is more specialist teaching the answer?

The Office for Standards in Education believes so. Its report, Using Subject Specialists to Promote High Standards at Key Stage Two, says the traditional "one teacher, one class" structure should be modified in favour of more specialist teaching.

The question of primary specialists is not new. It was broached by Her Majesty's Inspectorate in 1989, when the inspectors began to see the immense difficulties the subject range of the national curriculum placed on teachers. In 1992, the report of the "Three Wise Men" (Robin Alexander, Chris Woodhead and Jim Rose) further stressed the need for specialist teaching to support the work of primary generalists.

But teachers initially resisted the idea, says Colin Richards, former HMI and professor of education at St Martin's College, Cumbria. "They felt they should be able to cope - and believed they would, if only the national curriculum was reduced. But when the curriculum was scaled down in 1994, they were still unable to cope," he says.

OFSTED pushed for specialism again in its 1994 report, Primary Matters, and the subject has been regularly aired by Chris Woodhead since. Some schools are slowly moving in this direction. OFSTED says primaries need a mixture, where specialist support complements the work of the generalist.

Research shows that children tend to get better teaching from a specialist. In recruiting, schools need to aim for staff with a good range of expertise.

But, as OFSTED notes, subject co-ordinators cannot do much to raise standards when they have little or no time in which to discuss teaching with colleagues.

Many newly-qualified teachers will struggle to get the help they need from specialists, and be forced to rely instead on whatever resource packs they get.

To make specialist teaching work, primary schools need more teachers than classes - which is why very small and very large schools fare best in terms of specialists. But more teachers cost money.

"The Government ought to be thinking about this," says Colin Richards. "The risk is that any extra funding will automatically be used to cut class sizes instead."

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today