Don't defame the boycott bravehearts

28th May 2010 at 01:00

Estelle Morris, the former education secretary, gave a perceptive address this week to the National Education Trust debate in Oxford. In the discussion which followed, someone observed that pupils taking tests at 16 and 18 face standardised test conditions, have a choice of questions to answer and their coursework assessed to determine achievement. Sats, in comparison, are distinctly unfair.

How do those tests accommodate the variable daily performance of primary school children still on steep learning curves and still with variable memory development? How many schools have lost or gained pupils as a result of league tables?

The argument against testing (and inspection) is far from exhausted and those boycotting Sats in principle deserve wider support.

Mervyn Benford, Information officer, National Association for Small Schools.

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now