Don't waste cash on English

21st October 2005 at 01:00
* I was struck by the use of the term "significant" in the article "Don't waste cash on English" (TES, October 7). Researchers claim that spending an extra pound;100 per pupil raised key stage 3 maths and science scores by a small but significant amount (0.04 of a level), while extra spending had no effect on English scores.

We need to distinguish clearly between statistical and educational significance. Is the figure of 0.04 educationally significant? What in the real world is meant by 0.04 (one twenty-fifth) of a level? What real difference would that make to pupils' or schools' results? Is this, as the report suggests, an illustration of "bangs for bucks" or a case of "statistics for suckers"?

Professor Colin Richards

1 Bobbin Mill

Spark Bridge, Cumbria

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now