Double standards exposed

17th November 1995 at 00:00
There have been several references in your newspaper recently concerning the objectivity, or lack of it, shown by Office for Standards in Education inspectors when carrying out school inspections.

I am the headteacher of a small primary school which was recently inspected by OFSTED. We were fortunate to receive a very favourable report.

Preparation for inspection involves the production of a mountain of paperwork so, after we had received a clean bill of health, I passed on all our documentation to a fellow headteacher of a similar school which was also soon to be inspected.

Imagine our amazement when two documents that found favour with our inspection team were roundly condemned by the team inspecting my colleague's school.

I would suggest that headteacher colleagues all over the country should share documentation wherever this is appropriate. In this way, the sham of the "objective" inspection would be exposed. Surely, if OFSTED standards are being applied in a totally objective manner, documentation that has been praised by one team should meet with the approval of any other team.


Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today