Drug fear 'distracts' appeal panels

9th April 1999 at 01:00
PUPILS thrown out of school may not get a fair hearing because appeals panels are distracted by the fight against drugs and gang culture, says new research.

It identifies an "unconscious bias" as members of exclusion panels put the interests of discipline before their role as independent adjudicators.

The Liverpool John Moores University research found that parents of excluded children lack confidence in the system. Only 36 per cent thought they would get a fair hearing which may explain why only 8 per cent appeal.

However, parents are now four times more likely to appeal against exclusions than nine years ago. Seventy per cent felt the exclusion was unnecessary.

Permanent exclusions have risen dramatically with 12,700 in 199697 and 1,128 appeals. In 199091 there were only 2,900 exclusions and 92 appeals.

Ministers hope to tackle the problem by encouraging the use of continued on page 2 continued from page 1special on-site units - or "sin-bins" - for disruptive pupils, a proposal made in the recent Excellence in Cities document.

The Liverpool research, funded by the Nuffield Foundation, looked at 48 appeal hearings in seven education authorities. Researchers also heard from 289 parents, 99 education authorities, 111 appeal panel members, 106 heads and 67 school governors.

The researchers said panels called for a more "authoritarian approach in schools in response to indiscipline" and thought their role was to "reinforce the fight against gang culture or the drugs culture rather than simply acting as independent adjudicators."

Questioning was frequently stern and occasionally intimidating, a factor adding to parents' dissatisfaction. Middle-class parents were twice as likely to appeal as blue-collar parents, but those with children with special needs were less likely to appeal, even though their offspring were more likely to be excluded.

Convened by local education authorities, the panels are made up of lay people and others with educational experience, including teachers and governors.

The report recommends better information for parents and more training for panel members.

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now