Exam results shrouded in mystery

20th June 1997 at 01:00
In the March session of the University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate modular exam in geography:glacial processes, 107 candidates from a cohort of 225 received grades N or below.

This figure equates to some 47.6 per cent of the cohort actually failing. Recent correspondence with the examination syndicate has revealed some amazing facts, including centres that have withheld grades from candidates and the examining body stating that "some modules were more complex than others". So much for a standardised approach.

The syndicate has refused to reveal the names of other centres involved. Is this so that the candidates and staff involved suffer humiliation in private? My request is simple. Would other centres involved in this module contact me, at the address below, to formulate a plan of action?

It is easy for the mature to set an exam for the young to fail. Exams are designed to show what candidates can do, not what they can't do.

BRIAN LOMAS Assistant headteacher St. Aelred's Catholic High School Birley Street Newton-le-Willows, Merseyside

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today